Score any URL or draft against QRG, E-E-A-T, Helpful Content, Writer QA, and Editor QA — in one pass. Every flag carries the exact quoted line, the rubric criterion, and a one-line fix suggestion. No subjective "this could be better" feedback.
One scan. Five rubrics. Eighty-five checklist items. Every flag carries the exact quoted line from the article and the rubric criterion behind it.
No subjective "this could be tighter." Every flag carries the exact quoted line, the rubric criterion, and a one-line fix suggestion.
QRG, E-E-A-T, Helpful Content, Writer QA, and Editor QA — all scored in one scan. Eighty-five total checklist items with per-item pass/fail and quoted evidence.
Every fail or warn carries the exact line from the article that triggered it. No subjective feedback, no "this needs work" mystery, no debate about whether the flag is real.
The fix list is sorted by ranking impact — YMYL fails first, then E-E-A-T gaps, then HC issues, then craft polish. Ship the fixes that move the needle first.
Per-section scoring (intro / body / conclusion / CTA) so you know exactly where the article is strong and where it's leaking. No "the whole thing needs work" feedback.
Before/after for editorial teams replacing "this could be better" with rubric-driven, quoted, prioritized feedback.
| Area | Before | After | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Editor Feedback | "This needs work" with no specifics | 85-pt checklist with quoted evidence per flag | Actionable |
| Rubric Coverage | QRG OR E-E-A-T OR HC — never together | All 5 rubrics in one scan | 5× coverage |
| Evidence | Subjective + non-defensible | Exact quote from article per flag | Quoted |
| Fix Prioritization | Random order | Ranking-impact sorted (YMYL → EEAT → HC → craft) | Impact-first |
| Section Diagnostic | Whole-article grade only | Per-section scoring | Surgical |
| Speed | Manual review — 30+ min per article | One scan — under 60s | 30× faster |
| Pre-Publish Confidence | "I think it's ready" | Quantified grade across 5 rubrics | Defensible |
Content QA adapts to the role — writer doing self-QA, editor reviewing drafts, head of content tracking quality at scale, agency QA-ing client deliverables.
Run your own draft through the 85-pt scan before sending to editor. Catch the obvious E-E-A-T gaps and HC fails yourself — ship a cleaner draft, get fewer revision rounds.
Instead of reading line-by-line for QRG / EEAT / HC compliance, run the scan first and focus your read on the flagged passages. Manual review becomes targeted, not exhaustive.
Every article scanned. Every writer's average grade tracked. Every rubric's pass rate over time. See which writers are improving, which rubrics keep failing, which topics need rubric retraining.
Run every article through the 85-pt scan before sending to client. Catch issues client would flag before they do. Branded PDF report makes the QA work visible (and billable).
Scan a client's top 50 pages. Surface the highest-impact fixes per page. Hand back a prioritized list — "fix these 12 pages first, here's exactly what to fix on each."
Medical, legal, financial, and other YMYL verticals need defensible quality processes. Every article ships with a documented QRG + E-E-A-T scan as part of the publishing record.
Scan a published URL, paste a draft, or pull from Google Docs / Notion / your CMS — same 85-pt scan, same exports, same fix list.
Fetch + scan any public URL
Rubric evaluation engine
Paste or import drafts
Pull from Notion pages
Scan posts pre-publish
CMS draft scanning
Scan archived drafts
Scan against brief expectations
Fetch + scan any public URL
Rubric evaluation engine
Paste or import drafts
Pull from Notion pages
Scan posts pre-publish
CMS draft scanning
Scan archived drafts
Scan against brief expectations
Editor / client deliverable
Full 85-pt rubric export
Scan-complete notifications
Track grade vs traffic correlation
Pre-publish vs ranking outcome
Trigger on grade threshold
Editor / client deliverable
Full 85-pt rubric export
Scan-complete notifications
Track grade vs traffic correlation
Pre-publish vs ranking outcome
Trigger on grade threshold
Paste a URL or draft. Get a full 85-pt rubric scan, per-section grades, and a prioritized fix list.
Start with a $1 trial for 7 days. Card required. Cancel anytime — we don't lock you in.
$1 trial for 7 days on signup — card required; converts to Starter at $29/mo unless cancelled.
Content QA is QueryMint's 85-point content quality scanner. Paste a URL or draft, and it scores the article against five rubrics in one pass: Google's Search Quality Rater Guidelines (QRG), E-E-A-T, the Helpful Content System (38 self-assessment questions), Writer QA (7 craft dimensions), and Editor QA. Every flag carries the exact quoted line and a one-line fix.
Five: QRG (30 criteria), E-E-A-T (4 dimensions), Helpful Content (38 questions), Writer QA (7 craft dimensions), Editor QA (final-pass editor lens). All five run in a single scan.
Generic tools give you subjective rewrites ("try this instead"). Content QA gives you rubric-driven pass/fail per criterion, with the exact quoted line from your article that triggered each flag. No "I think this could be tighter" — every flag is defensible against the rubric.
Under 60 seconds end-to-end. The five rubrics run in parallel, with Claude scoring each criterion against the article text.
Both. Paste a draft directly, paste a URL to fetch + scan, or import from Google Docs / Notion / WordPress / Webflow.
Credit-based — a fixed credit cost per article scanned. See the pricing page for current plans. $1 trial for 7 days on signup — card required; converts to Starter at $29/mo unless cancelled.
Yes — medical, legal, financial, and other YMYL topics are detected and scored with stricter sourcing and expertise requirements per QRG.
Yes — PDF report (editor / client deliverable), CSV checklist (full 85-pt rubric per row), or markdown for in-doc commenting.
Yes — per-writer grade trends, per-rubric pass rates over time, topic-level quality breakdowns. Useful for content ops at scale.
Claude scores in 95+ languages. The rubrics themselves are designed around Google's English guidelines, but the evaluation runs in whatever language the article is in.
Sign up free, paste a URL or draft, run the scan. The 85-pt scorecard lands in under 60s with a prioritized fix list. See pricing →
Email us at info@querymint.com — we respond within one business day.
A connected platform — not a stack of disconnected tools. Every module shares your Asset Library, your Brand Profile, and your shared balance.
Our team responds within 24 hours, no demo required.
Transparent usage-based pricing. $1 trial for 7 days — card required.
12 modules across 4 categories — all on one shared balance.
Free usage on signup. First run in under 60 seconds.